{"id":202,"date":"2026-02-09T15:59:01","date_gmt":"2026-02-09T15:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/?p=202"},"modified":"2026-03-26T12:16:50","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T12:16:50","slug":"aesthetische-erfahrung-und-moralisches-urteil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/aesthetische-erfahrung-und-moralisches-urteil\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00c4sthetische Erfahrung und moralisches Urteil"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Frankfurt\/M.: Suhrkamp 1996<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"650\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Josef_Fruechtl_AesthErfMoralUrteil-650x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-155\" srcset=\"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Josef_Fruechtl_AesthErfMoralUrteil-650x1024.jpg 650w, https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Josef_Fruechtl_AesthErfMoralUrteil-190x300.jpg 190w, https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Josef_Fruechtl_AesthErfMoralUrteil-768x1211.jpg 768w, https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Josef_Fruechtl_AesthErfMoralUrteil-8x12.jpg 8w, https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Josef_Fruechtl_AesthErfMoralUrteil.jpg 812w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Die Habilitationsschrift schl\u00e4gt eine Rehabilitierung der \u00c4sthetik in ihrem Verh\u00e4ltnis zur Ethik vor und orientiert sich dabei an postmodernistischen (Foucault, Rorty), neoaristotelischen (Gadamer, Nussbaum) und \u00e4sthetisch-\u00f6kologischen (B\u00f6hme u.a.) Positionen. Das Verh\u00e4ltnis von \u00c4sthetik und Ethik wird nicht nach dem gel\u00e4ufigen Dualismus von strikter Unterscheidung und diffuser Einheit dargestellt, sondern differenziert in eine fundamental-, marginal-, parit\u00e4ts- und perfektions\u00e4sthetische Ethik, also in eine Ethik, die die \u00c4sthetik als Fundament, als marginalen Bestandteil, als gleichgewichtigen Bestandteil oder als Vollendung der Ethik begreift. Letztere bietet auf der Folie einer integrativen Konzeption von \u00e4sthetischer Erfahrung den besten Rechtfertigungsansatz. Integrativ ist diese Konzeption, sofern sie mit Kant, Schiller und Dewey die nicht-\u00e4sthetischen Dimensionen der Vernunft spielerisch miteinbezieht.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The habilitation treatise proposes a rehabilitation of aesthetics in its relationship to ethics, and is oriented towards postmodernist (Foucault, Rorty), neo-Aristotelian (Gadamer, Nussbaum) and aesthetic-ecological (B\u00f6hme et al.) positions. The relationship between aesthetics and ethics is not presented according to the common dualism of strict distinction and diffuse unity, but differentiated into a fundamental-, marginal-, parity- and perfection-aesthetic ethics, i.e. into an ethics that understands aesthetics as a foundation, as a marginal component, as an equally important component or as the completion of ethics. The latter offers the best approach to justification on the basis of an integrative conception of aesthetic experience. This conception is integrative insofar as it playfully includes the non-aesthetic dimensions of reason with Kant, Schiller and Dewey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1996<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":155,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-buecher"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":210,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202\/revisions\/210"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/josef-fruechtl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}